Really, the teachings of the Buddha all make sense.
Things you wouldn't imagine really are so. It's strange. At first
I didn't have any faith in sitting in meditation. I thought, what
value could that possibly have? Then there was walking meditation
- I walked from one tree to another, back and forth, back and forth,
and I got tired of it and thought, ''What am I walking for? Just
walking back and forth doesn't have any purpose.'' That's how I thought.
But in fact walking meditation has a lot of value. Sitting to practice
samādhi has a lot of value. But the temperaments of
some people make them confused about walking or sitting meditation.
We can't meditate in only one posture. There are four postures for
humans: standing, walking, sitting and lying down. The teachings speak
about making the postures consistent and equal. You might get the
idea from this that it means you should stand, walk, sit and lie down
for the same number of hours in each posture. When you hear such a
teaching, you can't figure out what it really means, because it's
talking in the way of Dhamma, not in the ordinary sense. ''OK,
I'll sit for two hours, stand for two hours and then lie down for
two hours'' You probably think like this. That's what I did. I tried
to practice in this way, but it didn't work out.
It's because of not listening in the right way, merely listening to
the words. 'Making the postures even' refers to the mind, nothing
else. It means making the mind bright and clear so that wisdom arises,
so that there is knowledge of whatever is happening in all postures
and situations. Whatever the posture, you know phenomena and states
of mind for what they are, meaning that they are impermanent, unsatisfactory
and not your self. The mind remains established in this awareness
at all times and in all postures. When the mind feels attraction,
when it feels aversion, you don't lose the path, but you know these
conditions for what they are. Your awareness is steady and continuous,
and you are letting go steadily and continuously. You are not fooled
by good conditions. You aren't fooled by bad conditions. You remain
on the straight path. This can be called 'making the postures even.'
It refers to the internal, not the external; it is talking about mind.
If we do make the postures even with the mind, then when we are praised,
it is just so much. If we are slandered, it is just so much. We don't
go up or down with them but remain steady. Why is this? Because we
see the danger in these things. We see equal danger in praise and
in criticism; this is called making the postures even. We have this
inner awareness, whether we are looking at internal or external phenomena.
In the ordinary way of experiencing things, when something good appears,
we have a positive reaction, and when something bad appears, we have
a negative reaction.
Like this, the postures are not even. If they are even, we always
have awareness. We will know when we are grasping at good and grasping
at bad - this is better. Even though we can't yet let go, we are
aware of these states continuously. Being continuously aware of ourselves
and our attachments, we will come to see that such grasping is not
the path. We know but can't let go: that's 50 percent. Though we can't
let go, we do understand that letting go of these things will bring
peace. We see the danger in the things we like and dislike. We see
the danger in praise and blame. This awareness is continuous.
So whether we are being praised or criticized, we are continuously
aware. For worldly people, when they are criticized and slandered,
they can't bear it; it hurts their hearts. When they are praised,
they are pleased and excited. This is what is natural in the world.
But for those who are practicing, when there is praise, they know
there is danger. When there is blame, they know the danger. They know
that being attached to either of these brings ill results. They are
all harmful if we grasp at them and give them meaning.
|