In any case, in our practice, no matter what aspect you refer to,
you must always begin from the mind. Do you know what this mind is?
What is the mind like? What is it? Where is it?... Nobody knows. All
we know is that we want to go over here or over there, we want this
and we want that, we feel good or we feel bad... but the mind itself
seems impossible to know. What is the mind? The mind doesn't have
form. That which receives impressions, both good and bad, we call
''mind.'' It's like the owner of a house. The owner stays put
at home while visitors come to see him. He is the one who receives
the visitors. Who receives sense impressions? What is it that
perceives? Who lets go of sense impressions? That is what we call ''mind.''
But people can't see it, they think themselves around in circles...
''What is the mind, what is the brain?''... Don't confuse the
issue like this. What is it that receives impressions? Some impressions
it likes and some it doesn't like.... Who is that? Is there one who
likes and dislikes? Sure there is, but you can't see it. That is what
we call ''mind.''
In our practice it isn't necessary to talk of samatha
(concentration) or vipassanā (insight), just call it the practice
of Dhamma, that's enough. And conduct this practice from your own mind.
What is the mind? The mind is that which receives, or is aware of,
sense impressions. With some sense impressions there is a reaction
of like, with others the reaction is dislike. That receiver of
impressions leads us into happiness and suffering, right and wrong. But it doesn't
have any form. We assume it to be a self, but it's really only nāmadhamma.
Does ''goodness'' have any form? Does evil? Do happiness and suffering
have any form? You can't find them. Are they round or are they square,
short or long? Can you see them? These things are nāmadhamma,
they can't be compared to material things, they are formless... but
we know that they do exist.
Therefore it is said to begin the practice by calming the mind. Put
awareness into the mind. If the mind is aware it will be at peace.
Some people don't go for awareness, they just want to have peace,
a kind of blanking out. So they never learn anything. If we don't
have this ''one who knows'' what is there to base our practice
on?
If there is no long, there is no short, if there is no right there
can be no wrong. People these days study away, looking for good and
evil. But that which is beyond good and evil they know nothing of.
All they know is the right and the wrong - ''I'm going to take
only what is right. I don't want to know about the wrong. Why should
I?'' If you try to take only what is right in a short time it will
go wrong again. Right leads to wrong. People keep searching among
the right and wrong, they don't try to find that which is neither
right nor wrong. They study about good and evil, they search for
virtue, but they know nothing of that which is beyond good and evil. They
study the long and the short, but that which is neither long nor short
they know nothing of.
This knife has a blade, a rim and a handle. Can you lift only the
blade? Can you lift only the rim of the blade, or the handle? The
handle, the rim and the blade are all parts of the same knife: when
you pick up the knife you get all three parts together.
In the same way, if you pick up that which is good, the bad must
follow. People search for goodness and try to throw away evil, but they don't
study that which is neither good nor evil. If you don't study this
there can be no completion. If you pick up goodness, badness follows.
If you pick up happiness, suffering follows. The practice of clinging
to goodness and rejecting evil is the Dhamma of children, it's like
a toy. Sure, it's alright, you can take just this much, but if you
grab onto goodness, evil will follow. The end of this path is confused,
it's not so good. |